Herald’s News Story Gatekeeper Livernois Disgusted with Public Commenting at Government Meetings

Did you ever wonder why newspaper stories are biased in favor of government and business — and against public interests ?

Livernois vs Citizens

Livernois vs Citizens


Well, we got a rare insight in a Herald blog article by Joe Livernois. Livernois is the Herald’s “City Editor” who has responsibility for all local stories. A City editor can and does block stories, remove or “edit” your quotes, and writes (sometimes highly) misleading headlines.

Livernois admits his disgust with, and is apparently not the least bit embarrassed about his name-calling attack on, citizens who speak at public meetings, those trying to help elected officials make better decisions, and give them informed advice against making bad decisions.

Livernois is bothered because “gadflies and kooks waste our time.” (See http://heraldeditors.blogspot.com/2009/08/gadflies-and-kooks.html )

Lets review whether the Political Power Deck (which he is supposed to be reporting objectively upon) is even remotely reasonably balanced:

Agenda Setting

Elected officials set the agenda and focus subjects on just those issues they want to deal with. The public can not add an agenda item unless they can get government to agree to do so. I estimate the ratio of government set agenda items vs public requested agenda items is roughly 1,000 to 1, probably even worse.

Continue reading

Share
2 Comments

What’s the difference between a Forest Ecologist, a Biologist, a Forester, an Arborist and a Horticulturist ?

Copyright 2003-2011 David Dilworth

  • An Ecologist is explicitly trained in the health of the interdependence of all biota in an ecosystem. A forest ecologist is trained in the health of interdependence of forest biota.
  • While Biologists generally care about biota, they are only trained to understand one species at a time. The exception is when they deal with diseases, such as beetles abnormally infesting a tree.

Continue reading

Share
Leave a comment

Protected: Part 2: What’s the difference between a Forest Ecologist, a Biologist, a Forester, an Arborist, and a Horticulturist ?

This content is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:

Share
Enter your password to view comments.

Part I: Was the Herald’s Letter-Editor Royal Calkins Caught Censoring & BlackListing, then Lying to Cover it up?

(c) Copyright 2009-2011 David Dilworth

I’ll never print anything from you.” – Monterey Herald’s Royal Calkins

Monterey Herald Letter Editor Royal Calkins-Angrily Censoring and Blacklisting Peninsula Residents

Monterey Herald Letter Editor Royal Calkins-Angrily Censoring and Blacklisting Peninsula Residents

After HOPE received an unusually high number of Herald political censorship complaints (on top of their complete lack of response to HOPE’s carefully written Better Water Supply Commentary) I called their letter editor, Royal Calkins, leaving a message asking to meet with him.

He never called back. Reflecting back over the years, he’d never returned any calls and had avoided my many requests to meet with him. However, not one to give up, I kept calling until he answered his phone on July 24, 2009.

After at most two civil sentences from him, when I courteously asked to meet with him about letters not getting printed, he not only refused to meet with me, his voice rose rapidly until he was yelling at me. At that point Calkins said (shouted actually) clearly “I’ll never print anything from you.”

Continue reading

Share
4 Comments

Carmel Pine Cone Publisher Paul Miller Now Censoring Art

Its hard to find any political issue the Carmel Pine Cone Publisher Paul Miller and I agree upon. His loathing for environmental protection, the laws protecting it, and his sucking up to Clint Eastwood and his Pebble Beach Company forest destruction project are a “good” start.
Continue reading

Share
1 Comment

Carmel Pine Cone’s Paul Miller – Wrong Again: Apparently Cell Phones Can Cause Head Tumors

Cell Phones Causing Head Tumors
(c) Copyright 2011 David Dilworth

Update May 31, 2011: “Finally-The First Official Recognition that Cell-Phones Could Cause Brain Cancer

Is Cell Phone Brain Damage Impossible?

Is Cell Phone Brain Damage Impossible?

It is unfortunate that it is necessary to disprove Paul Miller’s January 14, 2011 (unsigned) editorial in the Carmel Pine Cone with science facts, but like Rush Limbaugh, Miller (R-Jumps-to-Conclusions) gets so mightily exercised that when facts get in his way, he just detours around them.
Continue reading

Share
2 Comments

Mayor Dan Cort Gives Away Pacific Grove Museum

Lead by Mayor Dan Cort
Pacific Grove’s City Council Gave Away
Pacific Grove’s Beloved Natural History Museum
in June 2009 to a New Organization with No Experience or Money

This huge change to Pacific Grove has —

1. No Business Plan,
2. No Budget,
3. No Money or Funding Guarantee from the New “Owners,”

4. No Public Accountability (Secret meetings and documents)
5. No Fundraising Plan,
6. No Needs Assessment,

7. No Emergency,
8. No Open Bidding Process,
9. We must pay them at least some $150,000 per year, and yet the contract requires them to give our City nothing in return, absolutely nothing, except vague unenforceable ideas.

Details:

* There is No Business Plan !

This Contract will cost our City of Pacific Grove $3 Million dollars over 15 years.
Yet nothing in writing is due until three months after the council gives it away. The Council should not vote on a $3 million dollar contract until after they read a Business Plan that includes a Budget.

* There is No Budget!

But the City Has Guaranteed Costs of at least $180,000 a year (150k plus maintenance).

* There is No Fundraising Plan

* There is No Needs Assessment

Why would we need this. It costs the City just as much money to keep control as to give it away. What’s really going on here?

* There is No Money or Funding Guarantee

from the new (penniless) Organization. They Don’t Promise to Raise any Money – Only to Use “Best Efforts.” They even want our city to give back $185,000 the City received as a grant from the Packard Foundation last year.

* There is No Public Accountability

All Control was Given Away to a Private Group who’ll have Secret Meetings, Secret Plans, Secret Records. The City Must Sue Them (Legal fees) to recover any control or oversight.

* There is No Emergency

The Deadline is Fabricated, the Crisis is Manufactured. With or without the Contract the City has already Budgeted Museum funding for next Year at $150,000+.

Anyone who genuinely Cares about Our Museum and Our Town will still be there when we are ready. Why is this secretive group insisting we act now?

* There was No Open Bidding Process

Other Non-profits should be invited to help City Museum.

* Money Raised at Museum by this group can go to other Groups that have nothing to do with our Museum.

Who will get money from this misguided contract?

* Who Are Those Guys?

It Doesn’t Matter Who They Are

No matter who they are – this is a horrible One-Sided Deal. Our Museum is NOT “Leased” because We Get No Money from them – Its Just a Give Away to a Secret Group with No Guarantee of anything.

What we do know about them is —

1. The IRS says this Group is not a Foundation – its a regular non-profit (with no money) yet the group has a misleading name using the term “Foundation.”

2. Group has Changed Presidents three (3) times in only the recent six (6) Months – Chris Hasegawa (Jan. 09), Judd Perry, and Jason Burnett (May 09)

The Pacific Grove City Council lead by Mayor Dan Cort gave away Our Beloved Museum to People who have no Experience Running a Museum and no Money.

Questions –

* Why Does this group want Control?

* What is their Secret Agenda?

* What are the real reasons Mayor Cort fights so hard for this?

Share
Leave a comment

Dave Potter’s Anti-Environmental Voting Record

(c) Copyright 2004-2009 David Dilworth

Supervisor Dave Potter — Too Clever Environmental-Fraudster

 

Dave Potter is a Monterey Peninsula elected official with a long track record of voting for and influencing large environmentally harmful projects, including the Pebble Beach Company Forest Destruction Plan (Clint Eastwood’s Chainsaw Massacre), and trying fairly successfully to hide his harmful work and voting record. When his record is exposed he has turned very mean.

Potter very cleverly has many Peninsula voters and media falsely believing he is trying to protect our environment. The truth is Potter is constantly helping developers, perhaps with more influence than any other local elected official — not merely on our Monterey Peninsula, but all along California’s Coast as a Coastal Commissioner. He does a lot behind the scenes by pushing on agency staff, and a lot can be seen in his public votes – that the media ignore or are willfully ignorant about.

A common trick Potter uses is voting happily for environmental protection only when his vote is meaningless (when there are enough votes for the development anyway). He will even pound the table speaking out against development (“How can I protect our environment as the 1 in a 4-1 vote?”) when he knows a project already has enough votes to pass without his. This makes the other electeds voting for the project look even worse as bad guys; not that they often care.

But watch carefully when Potter’s vote is meaningful; when the votes are tied and his is needed for development; when his is the swing vote in a 4-3 decision. In those cases almost every time Potter votes For Development and Against protecting our Environment.

He has gotten away with this for a decade without the media catching on and for a long time the Sierra Club didn’t get it.

Potter’s trick is exposed when he is the swing vote on development or water issues, then he tries to vote quietly. When he is a swing vote on an important issue, he frequently “misses” the meeting. His smarter and less extreme Board colleagues (Water Board, Supervisors and Coastal Commissioners) have begun to catch on and when his vote does matter they are more often putting him on the spot where his vote will be publicized.

Being the swing vote puts an elected official in a powerful position to extract “concessions” out of a developer. I would love to see a list of the “concessions” Potter has pressured developers to deliver.

One can also reasonably ask why the Herald, the Pine Cone and the Weekly refuse to report on Potter’s arranging serious financial misdeeds and conflicts of interest. Click here to read a story that none of them ever reported. They all received this Press Release.

________________

Monterey County Supervisor David Potter owns a Contractors Building Business in Monterey. He served previously on the Monterey Planning Commission and City Council.

While Potter started out his Supervisor and Coastal Commissioner roles voting well – his votes have decayed miserably since 1997 and are now horrible. The best Commissioner voting record is about 90% good votes, and in 1999 Potter was at 64%.

But, since 2000 Potter’s votes are predominantly AGAINST our Coastal environment. Potter’s percentage of bad votes has increased to 80% – as bad as the worst property rights Commissioners ! 

http://www.sierraclub.org/ca/coasts/2000_votingchart.pdf

Dave Potter’s Bad Acts

(Partial List)

I. Forest Destruction and Huge Development Advocate

Pebble Beach Company’s Forest Destruction Project

Potter served as “quarterback” for Pebble Beach company as their designated advocate on the Coastal Commission. At the 2006 final Santa Rosa Coastal Commission hearing Potter jumped to approve the project – immediately after both government attorneys had informed the Commission the project was impossibly illegal. Thankfully, his effort was defeated 4-8.

 

  • As Monterey City councilman Potter engineered the gag agreement of City of Monterey in a deal with Pebble Beach Company Lot program and the Old Capitol site. It required the City of Monterey to support the Pebble Beach Company Forest Destruction Project in exchange for reducing the development at the Old Capitol site across the freeway from Del Monte Center.

 

  •  Monterey Pine Forest Ecosystem Protection – Powerful Foot Dragging

In 2002 a coalition of six conservation groups prepared and endorsed a proposed Monterey Pine forest ecosystem law and gave this proposed ordinance to Supervisor Potter (March 12, 2002) – but Potter has yet to lift a finger to provide the desperately needed protection for our vanishing forests. I have left 4 phone calls for Supervisor Potter on this exact subject since August 2003 and he has yet to return, or respond to, any of those calls.

When asked at the Democratic Party Candidate’s forum in 2004 Supervisor Candidate Susan Goldbeck instantly and fully endorsed the Monterey pine forest ecosystem protection law and committed to spending money to put it in motion.

On the spot, Potter sneakily ducked the answer. He only responded by saying something like —

“I’m proud of the City of Monterey’s tree protection ordinance (which is good and that he did help create). I’d like to see a debate between a tree protection ordinance like Monterey has and the proposed forest protection law.”

So Potter had a full opportunity to endorse the proposed law, to agendize it for discussion, or spend money to make it happen, but he intentionally and fully ducked (refused to answer) the question of supporting the forest protection ordinance.

 

  • In July 2000 Potter joined Clint Eastwood and Tony Lombardo in Sacramento to sell the Pebble Beach Company initiative to Gov Davis’ office, Keeley’s office, Fish & Game and Herzberg’s. 

The Gov & Hertzberg each appoint 4 Coastal Commission members !

 

Measure A – Colluding on the highly misleading “Save the Forest for Clint” Ballot Zoning

After more than five years since the voters passed this highly misleading ballot Measure A written by Tony Lombardo for Pebble Beach Company they had a problem.

The problem for Clint, Peter Ueberroth and Pebble Beach Company is “Measure A” is illegal and harmful – it blatantly violates the Coastal Act by allowing more development in highly protected coastal habitat – Monterey pine forest and wetland ecosystems (called ESHA or Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Areas), and it impermissibly zones the property of a single owner. If the County sent it to the Coastal Commission it should be tossed out right away.

 

  • For five years Potter was instrumental in manipulating County staff to keep the illegal “Measure A” out of the hands of the Coastal Commission – who must sign off on it before it finally becomes law.

 

    He prevented County staff from sending it to the Coastal Commission.

Clint and Potter colluded to delay sending the illegal Measure to the Commission so it gets there at the same time as the County’s approval of the massive Pebble Beach Company project – of yet another golf course and subdivisions.

That way if the Commission balks at the illegal and harmful measure, PBC can whine “but we went through all the hoops. You can’t tell us No now!”

Potter also engineered the illegal June 13, 2006 un-agendized Monterey County Supervisor’s letter (Brown Act violation) pulling Pebble Beach Company’s Measure A from the Coastal Commission’s agenda; causing the Commission to waste a whole day as that was the only item on that day’s agenda. He also caused dozens of people to waste their time and travel money.

 

Potter Votes to Convert Agricultural Land to Commercial

On July 1 1997 Peninsula Supervisor David Potter voted to convert excellent agricultural land (with a 40 acre minimum zoning) to commercial zoning on Highway 68 near the Salinas river. The land, owned by Bollenbacher and Kelton – one of Monterey County’s largest land development corporations, is at the intersection of Highway 68 and Reservation / River road. 15,000 square feet of office space on the land was also approved.

Up until July 1997 Potter has had a good voting record against further growth, urban sprawl and growth inducing freeways and dams. He had no reason to vote for this loss of agricultural land since it would have easily passed with the other 4 pro-growth votes on the County Board of Supervisors of Edith Johnsen, Tom Perkins, Judy Pennycook and Simon Salinas.

More Agricultural Land Conversion

Potter voted Coastal Comm (Mar 98) to Convert Prime Agricultural lands and allow Santa Cruz County to amend it’s LCP to allow for biomedical livestock operations.

RANCHO CHUALAR 2:

All 5 supervisors including Potter and Pennycook voted to approve EIR. Potter voted to approve Chualar II EIR even if he did vote against project. Dave Potter voted for EIR approval, against GP amend & Zoning on Chualar II.

Small but Awful Development

  • In 2004 Potter led the Commission to approve a huge illegal house on the beach right next to Asilomar – even though the Pacific Grove Planning Commission unanimously denied it.

 

Giving Away Our Water to Developers

In Spite of Our Water Emergency

Even though Potter knows full well that our Peninsula has been in a Water Supply Emergency since 1998 (because he is required to reaffirm it every year on the Water Board), he continually votes and works hard to approve new development and expand water use.

Potter voted for Clint Eastwood’s Monterra Ranch water permit Feb 24 2000. The vote was 3-3 so thankfully it didn’t pass.
Potter Supports Water Transfers

    • Pat Bernardi found Campaign disclosure records in Nov 2000 showing Potter had received $7,000 from the Cypress Inn Investors: Denny Levitt et all. – then he voted FOR their water transfer.

 

  • Potter voted for Robles Del Rio Water Transfer as County Supervisor 
  • AND voted for it again as Water District Director. Oct 26, 2000

 

(Actually he hand-held the water transfer project every step of the way)

  • Potter voted against stopping water transfers as recently as Feb 24 2000 Water District

When the first three pro-public interest directors were elected two years ago (2000), a process to dismantle water transfers began. As the needed fourth vote on a 7 member Board, Supervisor Dave Potter repeatedly made it clear he was in no hurry to stop this practice. Potter dragged his feet in every conceivable way and successfully kept water transfers alive for 18 months allowing many developments to complete their approvals and allowing many new applicants to get their paperwork submitted.

With the Nov 2001 election of Judi Lehman, running explicitly to end water transfers, and the defeat of incumbent Ron Chesshire, a new majority emerged making Potter’s stonewalling irrelevant. He no longer could cast the swing vote since there was now a majority of pro-public interest directors. They could get the needed 4 votes without needing Potter’s vote.

The new Board majority immediately put a real halt to water transfers on January’s agenda.

The board approved it 4-3 with dissents from Potter, Pendergrass (elected as Sand City’s Mayor with less than a total of 100 votes) and Seaside’s Alvin Edwards. After public comment closed, staff suggested adding an exemption for military properties. Some Board members asked for language about that for the next meeting.

For the February meeting, last evening, this issue was marked by threats of lawsuit by the city of Seaside, threats of recall of other Directors by Seaside’s Director Alvin Edwards and crowd roars of disapproval. The opposition was summed up by one fellow “We have the full spectrum on our side – all the Commercial property owners, Chambers of Commerce and the Mayors oppose this. What more could you want?” (maybe the public)

Dave Potter didn’t even show up, giving all the opponents an excuse to demand the item be continued until he returned – even though he had already voted against it.

Potter Hides Water Transfers

As Water Board Chair Potter rescinded the policy of having all water transfers come before the board – making it extremely hard for the public to find out what was going on. Potter has sharply cut off speakers, prevented public comments on some items and stopped Board members from asking clarifying questions of their staff before public comment. He kept this up in spite of strong criticism from the public and his own board.

Potter Didn’t Want Wells Regulated

After dragging his feet for 9 (or more) months Potter finally voted for a well regulation law for the Water District.

In 2000 Potter voted for himself for Water Board Chair & Alvin Edwards for vice chair. As swing vote on this appointment topic he aggressively opposed any Directors with public interest or environmental values for either seat. (dd: since that time Director Alvin Edwards has increasingly voted for our public interests.)

 

FREEWAY Support

 

  • Potter voted FOR the Hatton Canyon Freeway while on the Monterey Council.
  • Potter is For the Prunedale Bypass – He endorsed a full page ad in Mtry Co POST Oct 22 1998, pg 10 “Close to Buildout [peninsula?]” “A lot of growth is expansion of our familys.” (sic)
  • Potter forced the climbing lane past Carmel effort – and he fought having the County do an EIR on it even though Cal-Trans knew they would have to prepare an EIR if they did an almost identical project. Potter also violated the Coastal Act in getting it approved because it destroyed the “forested character” of the road;  trees lining the highway were not supposed to be decreased according to law (Coastal Plan).

 

See http://www.1hope.org/phwy1wid.htm

 

  • Potter cast the Key Swing vote

 

      (vote was 6-6 when he cast the final vote) FOR

Mendocino County’s version of the Hatton Canyon Freeway

      – the Noyo River Bridge – which will admittedly be

wider than the Golden Gate Bridge!

 

  • Potter twice refused to meet with Girl Scouts

who wanted to discuss their interest in protecting Monterey pine forests. When the girls pointed that out at a public meeting that Potter had refused to meet with, Potter launched an attack on the pre-teen girls and had a Girl Scout official write the girls a baseless letter of reprimand.

 

 

Potter Financial MisDeeds and other Bad Acts

 

Potter Hides Developer’s 2004 $10,000 Campaign Contribution.

 

July 8, July 9 & July 10th, 2009 – Monterey Herald stories on a $10,000 campaign contribution to Potter from local developer Nader Agha that Potter had diverted to a broker/developer (Russ Carter) rather than deposited in his Campaign checking account in 2004. Potter called Agha and first asked that the contribution be in cash. The check never showed up on a Potter campaign contribution form until Agha disclosed it in years later in May 2009.

Undisputed Fact: Both the Donor-Agha and the Recipient-broker/developer (Carter) agree that they did not know each other previous to the transaction but both knew Potter. This requires a conclusion that Potter arranged the $10,000 transaction, even though Potter denies any knowledge of it.

Undisputed Fact: Agha’s $10,000 check was cashed by Carter, but no one claims Agha’s $10,000 was paid back by now, some 5 years later. Forcing the conclusion that this was not a loan as Potter is trying to claim.

This means Potter knowingly arranged a “campaign contribution” and not only did not report it, he took pains to hide it – while getting the money – 4 to 5 years before the transaction was publicly known.

 

__________

 

Potter Hoodwinks Coastal Commission Staff into meeting at Developer’s Hotel

March 13, 2009 – Coastal Commission staff publicly apologized to Commissioners at today’s because it arranged last year’s Monterey County Coastal Commission meeting at Rancho Canada. This is significant because Rancho Canada is owned by the land use lawyer Tony Lombardo who was also representing a project on that meeting’s agenda.

Commission staff expressed regret for the conflict of financial and political interests and said they are taking steps to try to hold all future meetings in public buildings. Because they do not live in our area they apparently had no idea that Mr. Lombardo owned Rancho Canada until it was too late to arrange another meeting location. No previous Coastal Commission meeting had been held at Rancho Canada. Monterey County Supervisor. Coastal Commissioner Dave Potter was apparently lobbying for the meeting to be held at Lombardo’s building.

Potter also persuaded Coastal Commission Staff into meeting in San Francisco (at a large cost) in 2008 rather than for free in Marin County. Potter left during the meeting to attend a Fund raiser held for him only 3 blocks away by a lobbyist who often appears at the Coastal Commission.

Potter’s Positive Acts

Potter opposed the New Los Padres Dam in 1995. Still consistently opposes it. (However, as of May 2009 Potter now supports a “regional” giant growth water project which would take away our right to vote down another giant growth water project.)

Potter did significantly help stop the Hatton Canyon Freeway. (but Potter wants you to forget he voted FOR the Hatton Canyon Freeway while on the Monterey Council. And don’t pay attention to the giant Noyo Bridge in Mendocino County (wider than the Golden Gate Bridge) where it only passed because of Potter’s swing vote.)

Potter did vote against the Sand City Hotel – twice.

But there are those other problems . . .

So while Potter formerly did some good things even a few very good things,

 

  • Potter also voted FOR the Hatton Canyon Freeway while on the Monterey Council.
  • Potter lead great efforts to approve Pebble Beach Company’s imperiled Monterey pine forest ecosystem destruction project to make a golf course and subdivision development,
  • He happily votes for environmental protection when his vote is meaningless Water Transfers and September Ranch, and
  • Potter has not “consistently voted to preserve agricultural land,”
  • It is severely misleading to claim Potter voted against county water transfers when he alone “carried the water” for keeping them alive 18 months past when he could have voted them out,
  • the Watershed Council he “created” has admittedly done nothing
  • His Highway One Climbing Lane past Carmel is tainted by its law violations and environmental and aesthetic harm,
  • Carmel’s Highway One Climbing Lane is now congested again – proving that all Potter did was “move the parking lot” from Carmel Valley Road to Ocean Avenue and Carpenter.
Share
3 Comments

Correcting Pesticide Definition and Exposing Hypocrisy in Letter to Carmel Pine Cone Editor Paul Miller

Here’s another letter Carmel Pine Cone Editor Paul Miller refused to print. That refusal solidly reinforces the closing line from his Editorial that this letter responds to “… when you’ve already made up your mind about what a story’s supposed to be, the facts can just get in the way.

Pine Cone Editor:

Unfortunately, for your editorial “Wrong again, Ms Kay,” simple facts dismiss your opinion on what is a pesticide.
Continue reading

Share
1 Comment

Pine Cone turns American Dream Upside Down – Censored by Carmel Pine Cone Publisher Paul Miller

This is a letter sent to correct the abundant “whoppers” written by Carmel Pine Cone publisher / editor in his unsigned editorial “The Dilworth Phenomena.” (June 15, 2007) The Pine Cone refused to publish it, so here it is.

Letter to the Editor
Carmel Pine Cone
June 28, 2007

Pine Cone turns American Dream Upside Down

Hello Editor:

Thank you for highlighting HOPE’s extraordinary efforts to protect our community’s environment and democracy when local government takes action (June 15, 2007).

However, we were startled that your editorial turns the American Dream upside down.

Most of us grew up as Americans rooting for the underdog and fair play, but the Pine Cone’s professed ideal is to give the rich and powerful, like Mr. Eastwood or Paris Hilton, anything they want – even when it violates our laws.

HOPE’s experience is that the little guy can make a big difference and make ours a better world. We find it satisfying that a whole bunch of little guys and gals (some without college degrees, big bank accounts or directorial credits) helped protect a magnificent imperiled forest from a Goliath corporation’s insatiably greedy demand for yet another golf course while our community endures a water supply emergency.

Because Pine Cone unsigned editorials on public interest issues are more flat earth than fact, the following corrects some of the silliest errors.

HOPE received its (difficult to achieve) non-profit status from the IRS in 2002. Mr. Dilworth is indeed HOPE’s Executive Director and has been since 2002 when we hired him. To protect our members privacy, our membership list is private, just, as we suspect, is the Pine Cone’s subscription list.

One reason so many media contact HOPE is because HOPE and Mr. Dilworth are experts on many current environment and democracy issues. Dilworth / HOPE have particular expertise on some topics you mentioned including Monterey pine Forest Ecosystems, our Peninsula Water Crisis, and the Monterey County General Plan.

Continue reading

Share
2 Comments

Ex-Pacific Grove Mayor Sandra Koffman versus Our Environment, Democracy and the Truth

Pacific Grove Mayor Sandra Koffman versus Our Environment, Democracy and the Truth.

(c) Copyright 2000-2002 David Dilworth

Sandra Koffman - Eco-Fraud Mayor

Sandra Koffman – Eco-Fraud Mayor

 ““One may smile, and smile, and be a villain. ”
William Shakespeare, Hamlet

Mayor Sandy Koffman — from Environmentalist to Eco-FRAUD

Ms. Koffman and her husband Dan moved to Pacific Grove from Los Angeles and immediately started a group called Eco-Corps which mainly planted trees. As soon as Koffman was elected Mayor in 1994 Eco-Corps evaporated; they never met again, and most of their tree seedlings died.

Coast Weekly’s Squid calls Koffman an “Eco-Fraud” for just one of her (many) recent outrages (click here to read story).

 MS. KOFFMAN vs. OUR ENVIRONMENT

The Carmel River Dam

Ms. Koffman advocated for the giant new Dam, voted for it (1995 Mayors Resolution) and to ignore its many serious environmental impacts including its growth inducement.

MAYOR KOFFMAN vs. OUR WATER

Ms. Koffman worked hard to sneak water away from existing residents for more development – even though she knows we are enduring an Official Water Supply Emergency.

  • Mayor Koffman led the developers and other cities to persistently abuse Water Transfer “profiteering.” In trying to keep Water Transfers Ms. Koffman’s June 16, 2000 letter to the Water District worried that stopping transfers “would restrict the opportunities of commercial property owners to do business…” She did not write a single word about protecting residents existing water uses.
  • She regularly advocates for more water for more unneeded high-income housing development (Mansionization) and business growth in Pacific Grove. She has a perfect record of voting for every water increasing project on a Council agenda.
  • She attends Water Board Meetings only to stubbornly demand more water use for developers which takes water away from existing Residents and our Carmel River Imperiled Species – the Steelhead trout and Mark Twain’s Celebrated Red-legged frog.
  • Ms. Koffman opposed the Water Hookup Moratorium for new buildings in 1998.
  • Ms. Koffman advocated 150 acre foot more water use in 1993 – knowing no physical or legal water existed for increased use – that it would come out of our Rationing reserves.

MS KOFFMAN vs. OUR IMPERILED NATIVE MONTEREY PINE FOREST

  • In stark contrast to the false image of an environmental friend which she worked so hard to maintain – as Mayor she fought hard and voted to weaken our tree protection law (April 2002). Within months we experienced the Country Club Center Chainsaw massacre (6 huge healthy native Monterey pines destroyed and a large protest ensued), towering healthy trees were also cut down at the Library Park, the Middle High School, the Sunset Dr. entrance to Pebble Beach, and on August 27 – the Deer birthing habitat (Thicket) at the Cemetery was destroyed to an outpouring of citizen rage.
  • As Mayor she has allowed and even voted for increased destruction of our native Monterey Pines by Luckys in the County Club Shopping with Center. After voting for PG Luckys expansion she exclaimed – “I can’t wait to shop at the new Luckys.” This wholly unnecessary shopping center expansion lost us some huge, healthy rare native Monterey Pines. 

Continue reading

Share
2 Comments