Not Facebook – Instead try Minds.com, “One Social Web” or Diaspora

US President Obama warned high-school students in Virginia September 2009 —

“Be careful about what you post on Facebook, because in the YouTube age whatever you do will be pulled up later somewhere in your life.”

Not Facebook

Not Facebook
Credit: twrtoday.com

They trust me [with their personal information]. Dumb f**ks.” – Facebook President Mark Zuckerberg, 2004 1

Leave Facebook if you don’t want to be spied upon” warns the European Union in March 2015

I do have a Facebook account . . . but I do NOT and will NOT use Facebook for communication – or anything else.

Please *** NEVER, NEVER, NEVER, respond to a request from my Facebook account. (If you get a request or any communication from my Facebook account – it is clearly a scammer. Do not reply. Call me instead.)

This may seem a startling announcement from someone who has been at the leading edge of computer and information technology for decades.

I’m hardly alone.

Here’s a seriously cautionary article by Wired UK’s Editor David Rowan “Six Reasons Why I’m Not On Facebook.

I truly understand the benefits of web based Social Networks, and if you read to the end of this article I will let you know when I have found a system I can trust to genuinely protect you and me both.

I particularly want Elected officials and government employees to understand how much private information they are exposing by using Facebook, so they can adopt laws and regulations protecting our privacy.

(And NO, I do not “friend” anyone on Facebook for the reasons you will soon see . . .)

Here are the:

Top 10 Reasons I Refuse To Use Facebook

(Warning: If you viscerally “love” Facebook – you should stop reading right here) . . .

Update June 2012: Facebook switches off your email and forces you to use their own rusty email addresses. Oops they forgot to ask your permission first – for the 7th time.

Update Janaury 2017: How FacePlant (and Twitter) can destroy your reputation in 24 with a mistaken identity !

Outline – (Examples and links below this short list)

1. Facebook Constantly Lies to You.
2. Facebook Helps Burglars steal your stuff !
3. Facebook Helps Stalkers Find You or your Children  !

Continue reading

Share
1 Comment

Radiation or Radioactivity ?

Mainstream news stories almost always confuse the terms “Radiation” (photons) and “Radioactive” (physical materials), which are significantly different things.

Radiation Harm Chart

 

Radiation

    1. only affects things locally, very locally. While

Radioactive material

    can spread in the air and water and emit ionizing radiation all the way around the world.

Here are two examples of correct and wrong usage:

Continue reading

Share
Leave a comment

“Sustainable” Pacific Grove vs Our Environment ?

Recently a group of people, most new to our community, started several local groups often including the term “Sustainable” in their name; e.g. Sustainable Pacific Grove. Their main activities seem to concern energy and trash reduction, and shopping / buying local and “green” goods.

They were successful in getting several local mayors to sign a “Mayors Climate Protection Agreement” and getting several local cities to sign onto the “Urban Environmental Accords.”

However, as they admit – neither document has any force of law. Laudable, but not really meaningful in the hard-ball arena of local politics. I wonder whether anything in politics has changed as a result of those agreements.

Continue reading

Share
2 Comments

Japan’s Radioactive Fallout Approaching Chernobyl’s

Up until yesterday, the radiation from the failed Japanese Nuclear power plants at Fukushima was described as far less than Chernobyl released.

Experts typically opined by describing the danger along the lines of : “I don’t know how bad the Japanese nuke situation will get, but it won’t be a Chernobyl.”

Now just a few days later researchers report that the fallout is getting uncomfortably high: “Fukushima radioactive fallout nears Chernobyl levels.”
Continue reading

Share
Leave a comment

Bogus Logic Used to Justify Lazy Reporting

Newspaper writers and editors often defend incompetent reporting with scrofulous logic — “Both sides were angry so it must have been a good article.”

Publishing gibberish would also anger both sides of any controversial issue; and that takes no effort at all; a reporter wouldn’t even need to show up at the meeting and fall asleep.

Continue reading

Share
Leave a comment

Doing Nothing Beats Doing Wrong

“Doing Nothing is Always Superior to Doing Something Wrong”

– David Dilworth, March 2011

You probably can NOT guess who is my favorite President since I’ve been of voting age, or why.

You’re right, “favorite” is way too strong. Lets just say the “least disappointing” President.

Its Gerald Ford, but the “Why” may be more interesting.

OK, Quick – what is Gerald Ford known for?

Pardoning Nixon. Yes, that was a giant mistake. It tells the world how American politics lets the powerful get away with murder, sometimes literally. It shows Nixon was disgustingly right when he said “When the President does it, that means it is not illegal.

Continue reading

Share
1 Comment

Obama Starts War with Libya – Peace Prize Should Be Revoked

Actions Speak Louder Than Words

US President Barak Obama started a War with Libya on Sunday March 19, 2011.

At first the President Obama fired 110 Tomahawk Cruise-missiles on Libya, then on Monday a US fighter jet crashed in Libya.

Libyan media reported that 48 people were killed; “mostly children” and three times that many were injured. Associated Press reports that during rescue of the downed fighter pilots, a US aircraft fired on and severely injured 6 Libyan civilians assisting the pilots.
Continue reading

Share
Leave a comment

Part II: Herald’s Livernois – Censoring, Slander and Bullying?

Monterey Herald's Joe Livernois-Disgusted with Public Comments at Government Meetings

Monterey Herald’s Joe Livernois-Disgusted with Public Comments at Government Meetings

This is Part 2 of a report on HOPE’s first meeting with the Gary Omernick, President of The Herald, Monterey’s local daily newspaper.

A primary subject on our agenda is the Herald’s 7 year long Blackout; complete news and editorial blackout (censorship) of our Water Management District’s “Right-Sized” Water solution.

Continue reading

Share
2 Comments

How Many Deaths are Caused by Doctors and Hospitals?

Preventable American Deaths Yearly

435,000 Tobacco
365,000 Poor Diet and Physical Inactivity
Dr MalPractice - More Common than You Thought

Dr MalPractice - More Common than You Thought

100,000 – 200,000 Medical Error Deaths

Estimates range from 40,000 to 98,000 to 200,000

Iatrogenic” means Doctor caused Deaths

“A handful” = The number of doctors removed from the Medical field because they caused a patient death. (The actual numbers are unknown because the AMA seems to take great efforts to hide this information.)

Nocosomial” means Hospital Caused Deaths

“Never Events” are inexcusable outcomes in a health care setting (e.g. surgery on wrong body part)

Continue reading

Share
Leave a comment

I Don’t Give em Hell, I just Tell the Truth and they think its Hell

President Harry S Truman

President Harry S Truman

“I don’t give them Hell. I just tell the truth about them and they think it’s Hell.”
US President Harry Truman

That pretty well describes my experience in local politics.

Mark Twain, my father’s favorite humorist, said

“Always do right. this will gratify some people and astonish the rest.”

Mark Twain and Will Rogers are proof that if you want to tell the truth in politics, it helps to have humorist skills.

Continue reading

Share
Leave a comment

Herald’s News Story Gatekeeper Livernois Disgusted with Public Commenting at Government Meetings

Did you ever wonder why newspaper stories are biased in favor of government and business — and against public interests ?

Livernois vs Citizens

Livernois vs Citizens

Well, we got a rare insight in a Monterey Count Herald blog article by the Herald’s “City Editor” Joe Livernois. A city Editor is responsible for all local stories. A City editor can and does Block stories (sometimes for years), remove or “edit” your quotes, and writes (sometimes highly) misleading headlines.

Livernois boasts of his disgust with citizens who speak at public meetings. He is apparently not the least bit embarrassed about his bitter name-calling attack on those few members of the public who try to help elected officials make good and better decisions, and give them informed advice against making bad decisions.

Continue reading

Share
Leave a comment

Herald’s News Story Gatekeeper Livernois Disgusted with Public Commenting at Government Meetings

Did you ever wonder why newspaper stories are biased in favor of government and business — and against public interests ?

Livernois vs Citizens

Livernois vs Citizens


Well, we got a rare insight in a Herald blog article by Joe Livernois. Livernois is the Herald’s “City Editor” who has responsibility for all local stories. A City editor can and does block stories, remove or “edit” your quotes, and writes (sometimes highly) misleading headlines.

Livernois admits his disgust with, and is apparently not the least bit embarrassed about his name-calling attack on, citizens who speak at public meetings, those trying to help elected officials make better decisions, and give them informed advice against making bad decisions.

Livernois is bothered because “gadflies and kooks waste our time.” (See http://heraldeditors.blogspot.com/2009/08/gadflies-and-kooks.html )

Lets review whether the Political Power Deck (which he is supposed to be reporting objectively upon) is even remotely reasonably balanced:

Agenda Setting

Elected officials set the agenda and focus subjects on just those issues they want to deal with. The public can not add an agenda item unless they can get government to agree to do so. I estimate the ratio of government set agenda items vs public requested agenda items is roughly 1,000 to 1, probably even worse.

Continue reading

Share
2 Comments

What’s the difference between a Forest Ecologist, a Biologist, a Forester, an Arborist and a Horticulturist ?

Copyright 2003-2011 David Dilworth

  • An Ecologist is explicitly trained in the health of the interdependence of all biota in an ecosystem. A forest ecologist is trained in the health of interdependence of forest biota.
  • While Biologists generally care about biota, they are only trained to understand one species at a time. The exception is when they deal with diseases, such as beetles abnormally infesting a tree.

Continue reading

Share
Leave a comment

Protected: Part 2: What’s the difference between a Forest Ecologist, a Biologist, a Forester, an Arborist, and a Horticulturist ?

This content is password protected. To view it please enter your password below:

Share
Enter your password to view comments.

Part I: Was the Herald’s Letter-Editor Royal Calkins Caught Censoring & BlackListing, then Lying to Cover it up?

(c) Copyright 2009-2011 David Dilworth

I’ll never print anything from you.” – Monterey Herald’s Royal Calkins

Monterey Herald Letter Editor Royal Calkins-Angrily Censoring and Blacklisting Peninsula Residents

Monterey Herald Letter Editor Royal Calkins-Angrily Censoring and Blacklisting Peninsula Residents

After HOPE received an unusually high number of Herald political censorship complaints (on top of their complete lack of response to HOPE’s carefully written Better Water Supply Commentary) I called their letter editor, Royal Calkins, leaving a message asking to meet with him.

He never called back. Reflecting back over the years, he’d never returned any calls and had avoided my many requests to meet with him. However, not one to give up, I kept calling until he answered his phone on July 24, 2009.

After at most two civil sentences from him, when I courteously asked to meet with him about letters not getting printed, he not only refused to meet with me, his voice rose rapidly until he was yelling at me. At that point Calkins said (shouted actually) clearly “I’ll never print anything from you.”

Continue reading

Share
4 Comments

Carmel Pine Cone Publisher Paul Miller Now Censoring Art

Its hard to find any political issue the Carmel Pine Cone Publisher Paul Miller and I agree upon. His loathing for environmental protection, the laws protecting it, and his sucking up to Clint Eastwood and his Pebble Beach Company forest destruction project are a “good” start.
Continue reading

Share
1 Comment

Carmel Pine Cone’s Paul Miller – Wrong Again: Apparently Cell Phones Can Cause Head Tumors

Cell Phones Causing Head Tumors
(c) Copyright 2011 David Dilworth

Update May 31, 2011: “Finally-The First Official Recognition that Cell-Phones Could Cause Brain Cancer

Is Cell Phone Brain Damage Impossible?

Is Cell Phone Brain Damage Impossible?

It is unfortunate that it is necessary to disprove Paul Miller’s January 14, 2011 (unsigned) editorial in the Carmel Pine Cone with science facts, but like Rush Limbaugh, Miller (R-Jumps-to-Conclusions) gets so mightily exercised that when facts get in his way, he just detours around them.
Continue reading

Share
2 Comments

Mayor Dan Cort Gives Away Pacific Grove Museum

Lead by Mayor Dan Cort
Pacific Grove’s City Council Gave Away
Pacific Grove’s Beloved Natural History Museum
in June 2009 to a New Organization with No Experience or Money

This huge change to Pacific Grove has —

1. No Business Plan,
2. No Budget,
3. No Money or Funding Guarantee from the New “Owners,”

4. No Public Accountability (Secret meetings and documents)
5. No Fundraising Plan,
6. No Needs Assessment,

7. No Emergency,
8. No Open Bidding Process,
9. We must pay them at least some $150,000 per year, and yet the contract requires them to give our City nothing in return, absolutely nothing, except vague unenforceable ideas.

Details:

* There is No Business Plan !

This Contract will cost our City of Pacific Grove $3 Million dollars over 15 years.
Yet nothing in writing is due until three months after the council gives it away. The Council should not vote on a $3 million dollar contract until after they read a Business Plan that includes a Budget.

* There is No Budget!

But the City Has Guaranteed Costs of at least $180,000 a year (150k plus maintenance).

* There is No Fundraising Plan

* There is No Needs Assessment

Why would we need this. It costs the City just as much money to keep control as to give it away. What’s really going on here?

* There is No Money or Funding Guarantee

from the new (penniless) Organization. They Don’t Promise to Raise any Money – Only to Use “Best Efforts.” They even want our city to give back $185,000 the City received as a grant from the Packard Foundation last year.

* There is No Public Accountability

All Control was Given Away to a Private Group who’ll have Secret Meetings, Secret Plans, Secret Records. The City Must Sue Them (Legal fees) to recover any control or oversight.

* There is No Emergency

The Deadline is Fabricated, the Crisis is Manufactured. With or without the Contract the City has already Budgeted Museum funding for next Year at $150,000+.

Anyone who genuinely Cares about Our Museum and Our Town will still be there when we are ready. Why is this secretive group insisting we act now?

* There was No Open Bidding Process

Other Non-profits should be invited to help City Museum.

* Money Raised at Museum by this group can go to other Groups that have nothing to do with our Museum.

Who will get money from this misguided contract?

* Who Are Those Guys?

It Doesn’t Matter Who They Are

No matter who they are – this is a horrible One-Sided Deal. Our Museum is NOT “Leased” because We Get No Money from them – Its Just a Give Away to a Secret Group with No Guarantee of anything.

What we do know about them is —

1. The IRS says this Group is not a Foundation – its a regular non-profit (with no money) yet the group has a misleading name using the term “Foundation.”

2. Group has Changed Presidents three (3) times in only the recent six (6) Months – Chris Hasegawa (Jan. 09), Judd Perry, and Jason Burnett (May 09)

The Pacific Grove City Council lead by Mayor Dan Cort gave away Our Beloved Museum to People who have no Experience Running a Museum and no Money.

Questions –

* Why Does this group want Control?

* What is their Secret Agenda?

* What are the real reasons Mayor Cort fights so hard for this?

Share
Leave a comment

Dave Potter’s Anti-Environmental Voting Record

(c) Copyright 2004-2009 David Dilworth

Supervisor Dave Potter — Too Clever Environmental-Fraudster

 

Dave Potter is a Monterey Peninsula elected official with a long track record of voting for and influencing large environmentally harmful projects, including the Pebble Beach Company Forest Destruction Plan (Clint Eastwood’s Chainsaw Massacre), and trying fairly successfully to hide his harmful work and voting record. When his record is exposed he has turned very mean.

Potter very cleverly has many Peninsula voters and media falsely believing he is trying to protect our environment. The truth is Potter is constantly helping developers, perhaps with more influence than any other local elected official — not merely on our Monterey Peninsula, but all along California’s Coast as a Coastal Commissioner. He does a lot behind the scenes by pushing on agency staff, and a lot can be seen in his public votes – that the media ignore or are willfully ignorant about.

A common trick Potter uses is voting happily for environmental protection only when his vote is meaningless (when there are enough votes for the development anyway). He will even pound the table speaking out against development (“How can I protect our environment as the 1 in a 4-1 vote?”) when he knows a project already has enough votes to pass without his. This makes the other electeds voting for the project look even worse as bad guys; not that they often care.

But watch carefully when Potter’s vote is meaningful; when the votes are tied and his is needed for development; when his is the swing vote in a 4-3 decision. In those cases almost every time Potter votes For Development and Against protecting our Environment.

He has gotten away with this for a decade without the media catching on and for a long time the Sierra Club didn’t get it.

Potter’s trick is exposed when he is the swing vote on development or water issues, then he tries to vote quietly. When he is a swing vote on an important issue, he frequently “misses” the meeting. His smarter and less extreme Board colleagues (Water Board, Supervisors and Coastal Commissioners) have begun to catch on and when his vote does matter they are more often putting him on the spot where his vote will be publicized.

Being the swing vote puts an elected official in a powerful position to extract “concessions” out of a developer. I would love to see a list of the “concessions” Potter has pressured developers to deliver.

One can also reasonably ask why the Herald, the Pine Cone and the Weekly refuse to report on Potter’s arranging serious financial misdeeds and conflicts of interest. Click here to read a story that none of them ever reported. They all received this Press Release.

________________

Monterey County Supervisor David Potter owns a Contractors Building Business in Monterey. He served previously on the Monterey Planning Commission and City Council.

While Potter started out his Supervisor and Coastal Commissioner roles voting well – his votes have decayed miserably since 1997 and are now horrible. The best Commissioner voting record is about 90% good votes, and in 1999 Potter was at 64%.

But, since 2000 Potter’s votes are predominantly AGAINST our Coastal environment. Potter’s percentage of bad votes has increased to 80% – as bad as the worst property rights Commissioners ! 

http://www.sierraclub.org/ca/coasts/2000_votingchart.pdf

Dave Potter’s Bad Acts

(Partial List)

I. Forest Destruction and Huge Development Advocate

Pebble Beach Company’s Forest Destruction Project

Potter served as “quarterback” for Pebble Beach company as their designated advocate on the Coastal Commission. At the 2006 final Santa Rosa Coastal Commission hearing Potter jumped to approve the project – immediately after both government attorneys had informed the Commission the project was impossibly illegal. Thankfully, his effort was defeated 4-8.

 

  • As Monterey City councilman Potter engineered the gag agreement of City of Monterey in a deal with Pebble Beach Company Lot program and the Old Capitol site. It required the City of Monterey to support the Pebble Beach Company Forest Destruction Project in exchange for reducing the development at the Old Capitol site across the freeway from Del Monte Center.

 

  •  Monterey Pine Forest Ecosystem Protection – Powerful Foot Dragging

In 2002 a coalition of six conservation groups prepared and endorsed a proposed Monterey Pine forest ecosystem law and gave this proposed ordinance to Supervisor Potter (March 12, 2002) – but Potter has yet to lift a finger to provide the desperately needed protection for our vanishing forests. I have left 4 phone calls for Supervisor Potter on this exact subject since August 2003 and he has yet to return, or respond to, any of those calls.

When asked at the Democratic Party Candidate’s forum in 2004 Supervisor Candidate Susan Goldbeck instantly and fully endorsed the Monterey pine forest ecosystem protection law and committed to spending money to put it in motion.

On the spot, Potter sneakily ducked the answer. He only responded by saying something like —

“I’m proud of the City of Monterey’s tree protection ordinance (which is good and that he did help create). I’d like to see a debate between a tree protection ordinance like Monterey has and the proposed forest protection law.”

So Potter had a full opportunity to endorse the proposed law, to agendize it for discussion, or spend money to make it happen, but he intentionally and fully ducked (refused to answer) the question of supporting the forest protection ordinance.

 

  • In July 2000 Potter joined Clint Eastwood and Tony Lombardo in Sacramento to sell the Pebble Beach Company initiative to Gov Davis’ office, Keeley’s office, Fish & Game and Herzberg’s. 

The Gov & Hertzberg each appoint 4 Coastal Commission members !

 

Measure A – Colluding on the highly misleading “Save the Forest for Clint” Ballot Zoning

After more than five years since the voters passed this highly misleading ballot Measure A written by Tony Lombardo for Pebble Beach Company they had a problem.

The problem for Clint, Peter Ueberroth and Pebble Beach Company is “Measure A” is illegal and harmful – it blatantly violates the Coastal Act by allowing more development in highly protected coastal habitat – Monterey pine forest and wetland ecosystems (called ESHA or Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Areas), and it impermissibly zones the property of a single owner. If the County sent it to the Coastal Commission it should be tossed out right away.

 

  • For five years Potter was instrumental in manipulating County staff to keep the illegal “Measure A” out of the hands of the Coastal Commission – who must sign off on it before it finally becomes law.

 

    He prevented County staff from sending it to the Coastal Commission.

Clint and Potter colluded to delay sending the illegal Measure to the Commission so it gets there at the same time as the County’s approval of the massive Pebble Beach Company project – of yet another golf course and subdivisions.

That way if the Commission balks at the illegal and harmful measure, PBC can whine “but we went through all the hoops. You can’t tell us No now!”

Potter also engineered the illegal June 13, 2006 un-agendized Monterey County Supervisor’s letter (Brown Act violation) pulling Pebble Beach Company’s Measure A from the Coastal Commission’s agenda; causing the Commission to waste a whole day as that was the only item on that day’s agenda. He also caused dozens of people to waste their time and travel money.

 

Potter Votes to Convert Agricultural Land to Commercial

On July 1 1997 Peninsula Supervisor David Potter voted to convert excellent agricultural land (with a 40 acre minimum zoning) to commercial zoning on Highway 68 near the Salinas river. The land, owned by Bollenbacher and Kelton – one of Monterey County’s largest land development corporations, is at the intersection of Highway 68 and Reservation / River road. 15,000 square feet of office space on the land was also approved.

Up until July 1997 Potter has had a good voting record against further growth, urban sprawl and growth inducing freeways and dams. He had no reason to vote for this loss of agricultural land since it would have easily passed with the other 4 pro-growth votes on the County Board of Supervisors of Edith Johnsen, Tom Perkins, Judy Pennycook and Simon Salinas.

More Agricultural Land Conversion

Potter voted Coastal Comm (Mar 98) to Convert Prime Agricultural lands and allow Santa Cruz County to amend it’s LCP to allow for biomedical livestock operations.

RANCHO CHUALAR 2:

All 5 supervisors including Potter and Pennycook voted to approve EIR. Potter voted to approve Chualar II EIR even if he did vote against project. Dave Potter voted for EIR approval, against GP amend & Zoning on Chualar II.

Small but Awful Development

  • In 2004 Potter led the Commission to approve a huge illegal house on the beach right next to Asilomar – even though the Pacific Grove Planning Commission unanimously denied it.

 

Giving Away Our Water to Developers

In Spite of Our Water Emergency

Even though Potter knows full well that our Peninsula has been in a Water Supply Emergency since 1998 (because he is required to reaffirm it every year on the Water Board), he continually votes and works hard to approve new development and expand water use.

Potter voted for Clint Eastwood’s Monterra Ranch water permit Feb 24 2000. The vote was 3-3 so thankfully it didn’t pass.
Potter Supports Water Transfers

    • Pat Bernardi found Campaign disclosure records in Nov 2000 showing Potter had received $7,000 from the Cypress Inn Investors: Denny Levitt et all. – then he voted FOR their water transfer.

 

  • Potter voted for Robles Del Rio Water Transfer as County Supervisor 
  • AND voted for it again as Water District Director. Oct 26, 2000

 

(Actually he hand-held the water transfer project every step of the way)

  • Potter voted against stopping water transfers as recently as Feb 24 2000 Water District

When the first three pro-public interest directors were elected two years ago (2000), a process to dismantle water transfers began. As the needed fourth vote on a 7 member Board, Supervisor Dave Potter repeatedly made it clear he was in no hurry to stop this practice. Potter dragged his feet in every conceivable way and successfully kept water transfers alive for 18 months allowing many developments to complete their approvals and allowing many new applicants to get their paperwork submitted.

With the Nov 2001 election of Judi Lehman, running explicitly to end water transfers, and the defeat of incumbent Ron Chesshire, a new majority emerged making Potter’s stonewalling irrelevant. He no longer could cast the swing vote since there was now a majority of pro-public interest directors. They could get the needed 4 votes without needing Potter’s vote.

The new Board majority immediately put a real halt to water transfers on January’s agenda.

The board approved it 4-3 with dissents from Potter, Pendergrass (elected as Sand City’s Mayor with less than a total of 100 votes) and Seaside’s Alvin Edwards. After public comment closed, staff suggested adding an exemption for military properties. Some Board members asked for language about that for the next meeting.

For the February meeting, last evening, this issue was marked by threats of lawsuit by the city of Seaside, threats of recall of other Directors by Seaside’s Director Alvin Edwards and crowd roars of disapproval. The opposition was summed up by one fellow “We have the full spectrum on our side – all the Commercial property owners, Chambers of Commerce and the Mayors oppose this. What more could you want?” (maybe the public)

Dave Potter didn’t even show up, giving all the opponents an excuse to demand the item be continued until he returned – even though he had already voted against it.

Potter Hides Water Transfers

As Water Board Chair Potter rescinded the policy of having all water transfers come before the board – making it extremely hard for the public to find out what was going on. Potter has sharply cut off speakers, prevented public comments on some items and stopped Board members from asking clarifying questions of their staff before public comment. He kept this up in spite of strong criticism from the public and his own board.

Potter Didn’t Want Wells Regulated

After dragging his feet for 9 (or more) months Potter finally voted for a well regulation law for the Water District.

In 2000 Potter voted for himself for Water Board Chair & Alvin Edwards for vice chair. As swing vote on this appointment topic he aggressively opposed any Directors with public interest or environmental values for either seat. (dd: since that time Director Alvin Edwards has increasingly voted for our public interests.)

 

FREEWAY Support

 

  • Potter voted FOR the Hatton Canyon Freeway while on the Monterey Council.
  • Potter is For the Prunedale Bypass – He endorsed a full page ad in Mtry Co POST Oct 22 1998, pg 10 “Close to Buildout [peninsula?]” “A lot of growth is expansion of our familys.” (sic)
  • Potter forced the climbing lane past Carmel effort – and he fought having the County do an EIR on it even though Cal-Trans knew they would have to prepare an EIR if they did an almost identical project. Potter also violated the Coastal Act in getting it approved because it destroyed the “forested character” of the road;  trees lining the highway were not supposed to be decreased according to law (Coastal Plan).

 

See http://www.1hope.org/phwy1wid.htm

 

  • Potter cast the Key Swing vote

 

      (vote was 6-6 when he cast the final vote) FOR

Mendocino County’s version of the Hatton Canyon Freeway

      – the Noyo River Bridge – which will admittedly be

wider than the Golden Gate Bridge!

 

  • Potter twice refused to meet with Girl Scouts

who wanted to discuss their interest in protecting Monterey pine forests. When the girls pointed that out at a public meeting that Potter had refused to meet with, Potter launched an attack on the pre-teen girls and had a Girl Scout official write the girls a baseless letter of reprimand.

 

 

Potter Financial MisDeeds and other Bad Acts

 

Potter Hides Developer’s 2004 $10,000 Campaign Contribution.

 

July 8, July 9 & July 10th, 2009 – Monterey Herald stories on a $10,000 campaign contribution to Potter from local developer Nader Agha that Potter had diverted to a broker/developer (Russ Carter) rather than deposited in his Campaign checking account in 2004. Potter called Agha and first asked that the contribution be in cash. The check never showed up on a Potter campaign contribution form until Agha disclosed it in years later in May 2009.

Undisputed Fact: Both the Donor-Agha and the Recipient-broker/developer (Carter) agree that they did not know each other previous to the transaction but both knew Potter. This requires a conclusion that Potter arranged the $10,000 transaction, even though Potter denies any knowledge of it.

Undisputed Fact: Agha’s $10,000 check was cashed by Carter, but no one claims Agha’s $10,000 was paid back by now, some 5 years later. Forcing the conclusion that this was not a loan as Potter is trying to claim.

This means Potter knowingly arranged a “campaign contribution” and not only did not report it, he took pains to hide it – while getting the money – 4 to 5 years before the transaction was publicly known.

 

__________

 

Potter Hoodwinks Coastal Commission Staff into meeting at Developer’s Hotel

March 13, 2009 – Coastal Commission staff publicly apologized to Commissioners at today’s because it arranged last year’s Monterey County Coastal Commission meeting at Rancho Canada. This is significant because Rancho Canada is owned by the land use lawyer Tony Lombardo who was also representing a project on that meeting’s agenda.

Commission staff expressed regret for the conflict of financial and political interests and said they are taking steps to try to hold all future meetings in public buildings. Because they do not live in our area they apparently had no idea that Mr. Lombardo owned Rancho Canada until it was too late to arrange another meeting location. No previous Coastal Commission meeting had been held at Rancho Canada. Monterey County Supervisor. Coastal Commissioner Dave Potter was apparently lobbying for the meeting to be held at Lombardo’s building.

Potter also persuaded Coastal Commission Staff into meeting in San Francisco (at a large cost) in 2008 rather than for free in Marin County. Potter left during the meeting to attend a Fund raiser held for him only 3 blocks away by a lobbyist who often appears at the Coastal Commission.

Potter’s Positive Acts

Potter opposed the New Los Padres Dam in 1995. Still consistently opposes it. (However, as of May 2009 Potter now supports a “regional” giant growth water project which would take away our right to vote down another giant growth water project.)

Potter did significantly help stop the Hatton Canyon Freeway. (but Potter wants you to forget he voted FOR the Hatton Canyon Freeway while on the Monterey Council. And don’t pay attention to the giant Noyo Bridge in Mendocino County (wider than the Golden Gate Bridge) where it only passed because of Potter’s swing vote.)

Potter did vote against the Sand City Hotel – twice.

But there are those other problems . . .

So while Potter formerly did some good things even a few very good things,

 

  • Potter also voted FOR the Hatton Canyon Freeway while on the Monterey Council.
  • Potter lead great efforts to approve Pebble Beach Company’s imperiled Monterey pine forest ecosystem destruction project to make a golf course and subdivision development,
  • He happily votes for environmental protection when his vote is meaningless Water Transfers and September Ranch, and
  • Potter has not “consistently voted to preserve agricultural land,”
  • It is severely misleading to claim Potter voted against county water transfers when he alone “carried the water” for keeping them alive 18 months past when he could have voted them out,
  • the Watershed Council he “created” has admittedly done nothing
  • His Highway One Climbing Lane past Carmel is tainted by its law violations and environmental and aesthetic harm,
  • Carmel’s Highway One Climbing Lane is now congested again – proving that all Potter did was “move the parking lot” from Carmel Valley Road to Ocean Avenue and Carpenter.
Share
3 Comments

Correcting Pesticide Definition and Exposing Hypocrisy in Letter to Carmel Pine Cone Editor Paul Miller

Here’s another letter Carmel Pine Cone Editor Paul Miller refused to print. That refusal solidly reinforces the closing line from his Editorial that this letter responds to “… when you’ve already made up your mind about what a story’s supposed to be, the facts can just get in the way.

Pine Cone Editor:

Unfortunately, for your editorial “Wrong again, Ms Kay,” simple facts dismiss your opinion on what is a pesticide.
Continue reading

Share
1 Comment